In June 2021, GitHub announced Copilot, a sort of auto-complete for laptop code powered by OpenAI’s text-generation know-how. It offered an early glimpse of the spectacular potential of generative artificial intelligence to automate worthwhile work. Two years on, Copilot is likely one of the most mature examples of how the know-how can tackle duties that beforehand needed to be completed by hand.
This week Github released a report, primarily based on knowledge from nearly 1,000,000 programmers paying to make use of Copilot, that exhibits how transformational generative AI coding has turn into. On common, they accepted the AI assistant’s options about 30 p.c of the time, suggesting that the system is remarkably good at predicting helpful code.
The putting chart above exhibits how customers have a tendency to just accept extra of Copilot’s options as they spend extra months utilizing the software. The report additionally concludes that AI-enhanced coders see their productiveness improve over time, primarily based on the truth that a previous Copilot study reported a hyperlink between the variety of options accepted and a programmer’s productiveness. GitHub’s new report says that the best productiveness positive aspects have been seen amongst much less skilled builders.
On the face of it, that’s a powerful image of a novel know-how rapidly proving its worth. Any know-how that enhances productiveness and boosts the abilities of much less expert staff could possibly be a boon for each people and the broader financial system. GitHub goes on to supply some back-of-the-envelope hypothesis, estimating that AI coding might increase international GDP by $1.5 trillion by 2030.
However GitHub’s chart displaying programmers bonding with Copilot jogged my memory of one other examine I heard about not too long ago, whereas chatting with Talia Ringer, a professor on the College of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, about coders’ relationship with instruments like Copilot.
Late final 12 months, a staff at Stanford College posted a research paper that checked out how utilizing a code-generating AI assistant they constructed impacts the standard of code that folks produce. The researchers discovered that programmers getting AI options tended to incorporate extra bugs of their ultimate code—but these with entry to the software tended to imagine that their code was extra safe. “There are most likely each advantages and dangers concerned” with coding in tandem with AI, says Ringer. “Extra code is not higher code.”
When you think about the character of programming, that discovering is hardly stunning. As Clive Thompson wrote in a 2022 WIRED feature, Copilot can appear miraculous, however its options are primarily based on patterns in different programmers’ work, which can be flawed. These guesses can create bugs which might be devilishly tough to identify, particularly when you’re bewitched by how good the software typically is.
![Use Cases & Examples [’25]](https://blog.theautomationking.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/sully-1200x630-350x250.png)
